Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided February 27, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTION:

May a county or municipality impose ad valorem property taxes, under the guise of service fees, on a home for the aged exempt from ad valorem taxation by the state legislature pursuant to s.196.197, F.S., as amended by Chs. 73-340 and 73-344, Laws of Florida?

SUMMARY:

A municipality or county may not levy ad valorem taxes on qualified tax exempt homes for the aged because Art. VII, s. 3(a), State Const., and s. 196.197, F.S., exempt such homes from ad valorem taxation, and such levy may not be accomplished in the guise of service charges in lieu of ad valorem taxes because a county or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Bannerman v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Finlayson v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API