Legal Opinion

United States v. Alonzo Berrong and Jack McKay

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 22, 1983No. 82-8286PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Alonzo Berrong and Jack McKay were convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (West 1981), and of conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1981). Their appeal consists of several claims. We reject each of these claims and affirm the convictions. The only claim that merits any discussion concerns Berrong’s allegation that evidence was obtained from an illegal search of a marijuana field. The remainder of this opinion deals with this Fourth Amendment question.

F…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Warren J. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. CadaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. Bruce Christian Brown and James Patrick ManikowskiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. United States v. Lewis D. Crockett and Ruth Emma CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API