Legal Opinion

Tuck v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 4, 1959No. 36926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is a taxpayer’s suit for refund of estate taxes paid by the estate of George A. Tuck, brought under applicable provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1).

George A. Tuck, decedent, became a stockholder in Atlas Heating and Ventilating Company (“Atlas”), a California corporation, in 1909. As shown by minutes of a stockholders’ meeting on May 2, 1910 George A. Tuck owned a one-third interest in Atlas, the remaining two-thirds interests being owned by R. N. Osborn and F. H. Green. R. N. Osborn resigned as a member of the Atlas board of directors in July of 1916 leaving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matthew Rives McGehee of the Estate of Delia Crawford McGehee Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gidwitz' Estate Gidwitz' Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. Burns v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  4. Humphrey's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mary Tower English v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. First National Bank of Kansas City v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963
  3. Hooker Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API