Legal Opinion

Lavergne v. Roussel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 20, 1916No. 21828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by Albert Lavergne and others against Willis J. Roussel and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

On motion to dismiss appeal with damages. Defendant Roussel in proper person, without being joined by Jasmin Feitel, his codefendant and appellee, and without being represented by counsel, files what he terms a motion to dismiss.

[1, 2] The document is very lengthy, being composed of some 20 numbered paragraphs, many of which refer to the merits of the case, and some of them to matters out of the record. It also contains insulting and impertinent expressions which are forbidden in pleadings. All of these matters will be disregarded by the court in disposing of the motion.

Mover asks that the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salassi v. SalassiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. White v. LockhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Bertoniere v. SavoureSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Meraux v. AndrewsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API