Legal Opinion
United States v. Young
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 15, 2010No. CR-09-140-B-WPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
Although the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that an alleged violation of the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 641 does not state a continuing offense, the Court denies the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statute of limitations grounds because it is prevented from considering the Government’s offer of proof and the contents of the indictment are too vague to allow a conclusion that the charge violates the statute of limitations.
I. STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Michael A. YasharCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Leonard Levesque, A/K/A Jason Levesque, and Raynard LevesqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Donald F. FerrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Trang Huydoan PhanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- James Fratangelo v. John OlsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- United States v. ArnoldDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014
- United States v. Bravo-FernandezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- United States v. Colon-QuilesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.