Legal Opinion

In re Bach's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 12, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Accounting by the executors of the will of John O. Bach, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Ransom, S.

The testator died in January, 1885. For nearly 85 years prior thereto he bad been engaged in the business of selling proprietary medicines, chiefly Townsend’s Sarsaparilla. During the greater part of this time the executor Butler had been manager and confidential clerk. At the time of the testator’s death the firm was composed of the deceased and E. B. Hostrand. Subsequent to the death of the testator, and up to January, 1888, the business was continued under the firm name of Bach feHostrand, the parties thereto being the qualifying executors of the testator and the surviving…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Schenck v. . DartNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Boerum v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Munro v. AllaireCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1805
  5. In re LaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SilkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API