Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1936No. 26716PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant husband in the trial court appeals from that part of the judgment awarding a divorce to his wife in which the trial court directed that he pay her $7,200 alimony, at $90 per month, and $25 per month support money for the ten year old son of the parties. No contentions are made except that such award of alimony is excessive and not supported by evidence.

Excepting certain household furniture and royalty interests of negligible value, the decree left all of the property accumulated by the parties in the name of the defendant. This included the home of the parties, also a 110-acre…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Moseley v. MoseleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Winslow v. WinslowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brasier v. BrasierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Smyth v. SmythSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Turlington v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Mathews v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API