Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1981No. 16638PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Defendant seeks reversal of a second-degree felony conviction of theft by receiving. The issues raised involve the legality of a motor vehicle search and the admissibility of subsequently derived evidence, the adequacy of the affidavit for a search warrant, the correctness of the court’s refusal to compel disclosure of an informant’s identity, and the constitutionality of relying on information allegedly obtained from a privileged attorney-client communication.

On August 25, 1979, defendant was stopped while driving a pickup truck and arrested on a matter not in issue here by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HyghUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. StandifordUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. StricklingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. State v. NorrisUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API