Legal Opinion

Bannout v. Brownell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 8, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 3818-52PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to establish the plaintiff’s eligibility for naturalization as a citizen of the United States.

There is a preliminary question in this case, namely, whether this action may be maintained. The Government contends, on the authority of Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603, 97 L.Ed. 972, that since the deportation of the plaintiff has been ordered his only remedy is by writ of habeas corpus after he has been arrested for deportation and that he may not maintain an action for a declaratory judgment. The Heikkila case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nani v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API