Legal Opinion

Kheel v. Continental Baking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that Sanford Liebschutz, Esq., and the law firm of Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield (Chamberlain firm) should be disqualified from further representation of defendant. Plaintiffs are part owners of premises leased to defendant since 1962. They commenced this action seeking judgment declaring that defendant breached the,lease by using the premises in violation of applicable zoning laws and regulations. Liebschutz represented plaintiffs in the negotiation and execution of the lease in 1962,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In re the Estate of SalzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yasin v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rainbow Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Gigante, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API