Legal Opinion

City of Aurora v. Dale

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. Hiram H. Cody, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action .was brought by Mary Dale against the city of Aurora, to recover for personal injuries which she received in consequence of a defective sidewalk in the city, over which she was passing. At the place where the accident occurred a board Avas missing, Avhich Avas not observed by her until she stepped in the hole, Avhich caused her to fall, by Avhich she sustained a severe fracture of a bone of her arm. The injury AAras a severe one, and rendered her incapable, for the time being, of following her usual avocation, which was that of a nurse. It is conceded the damages found are not too…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Village of Clayton v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Mattoon v. FallerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pitman v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  4. City of Bloomington v. AnnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  5. City of Litchfield v. AnglimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API