Legal Opinion

Evans v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 5, 2013No. 2011-CA-01414-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, P.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Guy E. Evans appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Joel Howell. The trial court determined that the statute of limitations for a legal-malpractice claim had expired before the complaint was filed. Evans argues that the grant of summary judgment was not proper. We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. Robert J. Giordano and Evans owned and operated several businesses. They formed Evans/Giordano Inc. (“EGI”) to sell insurance and related products. Giordano and Evans each owned fifty percent of the stock in EGI. Joel Howell performed legal services for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stephens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of USMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wayne General Hosp. v. HayesMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Williamson Ex Rel. Williamson v. KeithMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jennings v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  2. Victor Daren Froemel v. Danny WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  3. Robert Lehman v. Thomas PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. William A. McDaniel v. Wayne E. Ferrell Jr.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API