Legal Opinion

Rice v. Kilworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1931No. 29,740PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to recover upon certain promissory notes. The defendant, appellant herein, set up as an offset a contract on the part of the plaintiff to buy back certain bonds sold him by the plaintiff. Plaintiff pleaded, amongst other things, that recovery on this contract was barred by laches on the part of the defendant. Judgment was for plaintiff for the amount of the notes, and defendant appeals.

The facts' are that in the fall of 1915 John L. Kilworth purchased from the Watkins National Bank some bonds of Oklahoma City, Olda,, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. . TraskNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. City of Hutchinson v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Greene v. McAuleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Zecha v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Travis v. GlickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Travis v. GlickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. City of Eureka v. Kansas Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Ketter v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API