Jordan v. Woodward
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Bill in Equity, to which was filed a general demurrer. The substance of the bill appears in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtAppleton, J.
— The bill alleges, that the complainants are the owners and entitled to the use of four-fifths, and the respondent of one fifth of the water of the “five saw dam,” so called; that within six months past, the respondent has erected a mill, and during that period drawn one-third of the water instead of the one-fifth, to which he was justly entitled; and that in consequence of such wrongful act, they have been deprived of the use of a portion of the water belonging to them. Then follows the prayer for an injunction. There has been no judicial decision establishing a violation of the rights of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Moundsville Water Co. v. Moundsville Sand Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- Williams v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Clarke v. ThatcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Perkins v. FoyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
- Dyer v. Cranston Print Works Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.