Attorney General Ex Rel. Cook v. O'Neill
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceNorth, J.
I concur in the result reached by Mr. Justice Sharpe and Mr. Justice Potter; but I am not in accord with the reasoning by which that result has been obtained. The opinion of the former unduly restricts the powers of the legislative branch of our State government; and the opinion of Mr. Justice Potter appears to me to he based upon the erroneous assumption that the qualifications requisite to serve as a circuit judge are expressed in our Constitution. I know of no such constitutional provisions in this State.
“Where, however, the Constitution does not prescribe the qualifications (for public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huff v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Widincamp v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Taggart ex rel. Jackson v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889