Legal Opinion

Gropp v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 3, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner —

Affirming.

For several years prior to the date of the contract hereinafter mentioned, appellant, P. C. Gropp, and his brothers, A. H. Gropp and Joseph Gropp, were engaged in the retail shoe business in the city of Owensboro, and had built np a prosperous business. On December 10, 1906, they sold their business, stock of goods, etc., to T. B. Sanders and appellee, J. E. Perkins. The contract provided for a cash payment of $10,000, and for the execution of notes for the balance of the value of the goods as shown by invoice. The goods were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Francisco v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Cushing v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Duffy v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Works (Thomas) Inc. v. Hazard Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  2. Torian v. FuquaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Scott's Administrators v. City of MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Fiscal Court v. Kentucky Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API