Legal Opinion

Horgan v. Sandy City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 27, 2012No. 20110614-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

1 1 Patrick Horgan appeals the denial of a petition to expunge records of his arrest, investigation, and detention. See Utah Code Ann. § 77-40-104 (Supp.2011). The district court denied the petition after finding that it would be contrary to the public interest to grant expungement. We affirm.

12 "Probation and expungement of one's record are neither matters of right nor of grace, but can only be granted when they appear to be compatible with the public interest." State v. Chambers, 533 P.2d 876, 878 (Utah 1975) (construing former Utah Code section T7-35-17 (repealed July 1, 1980).…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  3. English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. State v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1975

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. A.R.A. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  2. State v. D.L.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. D.L.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. Windsor Mobile Estates, LLC v. SweazeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API