Marquez v. Premo

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR), raising three assignments of error. We reject without written discussion petitioner’s first and supplemental assignments of error.1 In his second assignment of error, petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred in entering a judgment that does not comply with ORS 138.640(1), as construed in Datt v. Hill, 347 Or 672, 227 P3d 714 (2010). In Datt, the Supreme Court held that a judgment denying claims for post-conviction relief must, at a minimum:

“(1) identify the claims for relief that the court…