Legal Opinion
Rutland Cable T. v. Inc. v. City of Rutland
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 29, 1960No. 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
This is the third time the petitioner has resorted to mandamus in aid of its application of September 10, 1959 to the City Council of Rutland for a permit to construct television cable facilities in that city. The prior proceedings are reported in 121 Vt. 399, 159 A.2d 83 and 122 Vt. 1, 163 A.2d 117.
The present petition alleges in substance that following the mandate of this Court, at the January Term, 1960, the city council caused to be published the application of the petitioner and a similar application of the Bellows Falls Cable Corporation, together with a notice of hearing on both…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Applestein v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Butler v. Town of East BridgewaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Gerard Couture v. Selectmen of BerkshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Corcoran v. Village of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Groh v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Dana Corporation v. YusitisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- City of Burlington v. New York Times Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.