Legal Opinion

Spearman v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1971No. 46545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff executed a covenant not to sue one of the three defendants to this suit, Lothridge. The covenant recited that the monetary consideration given to plaintiff was paid by the liability carrier of Lothridge and was taken "without the knowledge or consent” of Lothridge, the insured. Subsequently, the attorney for plaintiff and the attorney for Lothridge and his insurer executed a rescission of the covenant not to sue, and simultaneously executed another covenant not to sue which provided that the covenant was taken with the consent and knowledge of Lothridge. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. KightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Fillingame v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Scarbrough v. Andrews Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spearman v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Milline v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Black v. Cotton States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API