Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Roussel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 3, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. Mrs. Shepard was injured when the defendant’s automobile in which she was riding ran into the rear end of another automobile demolishing its trunk and gasoline tank and perhaps splitting its chassis. Her husband seeks consequential damages. Verdicts for the defendant under leave reserved were entered after the jury returned verdicts for the plaintiffs. We assume without deciding that Mrs. Shepard was not engaged in a common employment with the defendant but was his guest who could recover from him if she proved his gross negligence. See Motta v. Mello, 338 Mass. 170,172.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Bagley v. BurkholderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Motta v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Bruno v. DonahueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Lalumiere v. MieleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Grand Circle Travel, LCCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  2. Dow v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Dow v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  4. Hamilton v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Plesz v. RaymondMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API