Legal Opinion
Burnsed v. Murray
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 27, 1945No. Civ. No. 14776PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
—
Action for personal injuries caused by an automobile running down a pedestrian in an intersection.
There are two defendants, but one is the owner of the automobile and is sued to recover on her liability under the Vehicle Code for permitting the other defendant, driver of the car, to operate it. Therefore, we will speak of the defendant driver as the defendant.
The plaintiff, a “newsboy” 58 years of age, testified that on the night of the accident shortly after midnight he was selling papers at the intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard and Highland Avenue in the city of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Malloway v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Morgan v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Kling v. Crown Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dandini v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947