Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Department of Social Services v. Charles B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*456The Family Court properly denied the application. Family Court Act § 451 (1) provides that a “modification, set aside or vacatur shall not reduce or annul child support arrears accrued prior to the making of an application pursuant to this section.” Respondent’s reliance on Matter of Blake v Syck (230 AD2d 596, 599 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 811 [1997]) is misplaced, as in that case the father’s income never exceeded the poverty income guidelines, and accordingly the child support arrears could not exceed $500 (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]; see also Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blake v. SyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Campos v. CamposAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ana B. v. Hector N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Ana B. v. Hector N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API