Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentSeymour, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case. I would affirm on the basis of the tax court’s opinion.
*358As the majority recognizes, when the Treasury is given a specific grant of authority to promulgate regulations, there is a strong presumption in favor of the validity of those regulations. See United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co., 455 U.S. 16, 24, 102 S.Ct. 821, 827, 70 L.Ed.2d 792 (1982); Commissioner v. Portland Cement Co. of Utah, 450 U.S. 156, 169, 101 S.Ct. 1037, 1045, 67 L.Ed.2d 140 (1981). Regulations are invalid, however, if they are unreasonable or plainly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commissioner v. Portland Cement Co. of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.