Legal Opinion
State v. Arrowood
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 17, 2007No. 4304PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
Tim Wayne Arrowood appeals his convictions for first-degree burglary and larceny, arguing the trial judge erred by refusing to suppress Arrowood’s statements to police. Specifically, Arrowood contends his statements to police were involuntary and inadmissible because they were induced by promises of leniency. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 28, 2004, Dayle Walker reported a toolbox missing from his residence in Campobello, South Carolina. Walker explained he always kept the toolbox in an enclosed porch at the back of his home, and, upon returning from work, he noticed it was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hutto v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Johnathan L. HillaryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court · 2008