Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Zelma C. Wyche v. C. E. Hester

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1970No. 28215Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, Circuit Judge

I concur in that portion of the majority opinion which holds that Wyche was not, at the time of his trial, entitled to a jury.

I regret the necessity for emphatically dissenting to the remainder of the majority opinion holding .that Wyche is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. That regret is sharpened by the belief that the majority inflicts an unwarranted Sunday punch upon the already sagging ability of local governments to enforce their laws against crimes of violence.

I think this case should have been affirmed on the able (and, in my opinion, unassailable) opinion of the District Court, 273…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Wyche v. HesterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API