Sicolo v. Prudential Savings Bank on Brooklyn

Appeals from (1) an order dated March 19, 1956 granting a motion to dismiss the original complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, (2) from an order dated August 1, 1956 denying a motion for leave to reargue said motion, and (3) from an order dated August 1, 1956 denying a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the cause of action therein alleged is barred by the Statute of Limitations. The appeal from the order denying the motion to reargue has been withdrawn by appellant in Ms brief. *791Order dated March 19, 1956…