Legal Opinion

State v. Edgar

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 23, 2017No. 20150594-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOROS, Judge:

¶1 Michael John Edgar appeals his convictions for various drug offenses. Edgar principally contends that his trial counsel performed ineffectively by not objecting to testimony that Edgar tried to negotiate a plea deal based on his ties to drug dealers. But Edgar admitted to police that the drugs in question were his, and his admission was corroborated by another witness. Accordingly, he cannot demonstrate that his counsel’s trial performance resulted in prejudice. We therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 On November 21, 2013 officers followed a vehicle that left Edgar’s home…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API