State ex rel. Marshall ex rel. Franklin v. Hercey
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action for a declaration of paternity and other relief. Following a jury verdict in favor of Defendant on the paternity issue, Plaintiffs appeal.
Defendant, in his brief and by separate motion, urges we dismiss the appeal, alleging numerous violations by Plaintiffs of Rule 84.-04. Because all of Plaintiffs’ points relied on violate Rule 84.04(d), we dismiss the appeal.
With one change,1 we reproduce verbatim Plaintiffs’ seven points relied on:
*880I. The trial court erred in refusing to grant petitioners’ motion for a new trial because the verdict was against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Powell v. Norman Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Mayfield v. City of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Johnson v. PatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jones v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shiyr v. PinckneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Trapp v. BarleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- DeCota v. J.E.M. Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- White v. SweeneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995