Legal Opinion

Rojas v. Con Edison

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 23, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this personal injury action, plaintiff alleges that she tripped and fell over a gas valve cap embedded in a sidewalk and that Ellivkroy Realty, Inc. (defendant), as the abutting landowner, was responsible for the defective condition of the gas valve cap and thus liable to plaintiff for the injuries she sustained when she fell. Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the grounds that it was not responsible for the maintenance of the gas valve cap and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Early v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Hurley v. Related Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bouratoglou v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  2. Klau v. Belair BuildingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Klau v. Belair BuildingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. Sabino (Shaday)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API