Legal Opinion

Schnitzer v. Buerger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Defendant seeks to modify a final decree of divorce by reducing what is said to be the amount of alimony made payable by defendant by that judgment, lest he later be held in contempt of court for its violation. He asserts such a change in his fortunes as to make it impossible for him to meet the payments which he had contracted to make in an agreement referred to in the final judgment of divorce. This claim of financial distress is denied by *623plaintiff. By the order appealed from, the Special Term has referred that dispute to a referee who is to take the evidence and report thereon to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kunker v. KunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Holahan v. HolahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Helvering v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Ridenour v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In Re RidderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Lang v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API