Legal Opinion
State of California v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1968No. Civ. 24898PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (H. C.), J.
The State of California by an action in declaratory relief seeks an adjudication that wages of seamen earned on Pacific Far East Line vessels unclaimed for seven years constitute abandoned property and are subject to the provisions of the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (California Act). (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1500-1527.) The trial court granted defendant Pacific Far East Line’s motion for summary judgment and the State of California appeals.
The only question presented is: Did the trial court err in adjudging Pacific Far Bast Line, Inc., a California corporation,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hill v. Florida Ex Rel. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Presley v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Estate of TischlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Shea v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Opinion No. (1988), Missouri Attorney General Reports1988