Cook v. Williams
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
ROY, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this matter is appearing pro se, and this Court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has carefully reviewed the plaintiff’s complaint and concludes that this is a case where it is appropriate for the Court to exercise its authority to dismiss the case sua sponte based upon the frivolous nature of the suit as well as lack of jurisdiction. Although sua sponte dismissals are not favored, they are authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) if the Court is satisfied the action is frivolous. Munz v. Parr, 758 F.2d 1254…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fay Monroe Van Meter v. Leroy Morgan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of CalhouncountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Munz v. ParrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Callahan v. RendlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Womack v. Mays (In Re Womack)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
- Cornelious v. Bishop (Cornelious)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997
- Williams v. Gruber (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Williams v. Piazza (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.