Legal Opinion

Newhouse v. Harrinck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, J.

The defendant Frank Newhouse died while the above-entitled action was pending, and it was continued against his executrix. It had been brought by the wife of Newhouse to compel him to account for the proceeds of a savings bank account in the Union Savings Bank of Patchogue, which plaintiff alleged was opened in the following form: “ Frank Newhouse and Laura J. Newhouse, payable to either or the survivor.”

Decedent, a widower (seventy-nine years of age), and plaintiff, a widow (fifty-eight years of age), were married on November 1, 1927. It was Mrs. Newhouse’s fourth matrimonial venture. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. O'Connor v. . DunniganNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ambruster v. AmbrusterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of SutterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In re the Estate of HolmesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. Marrow v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API