Legal Opinion
The Transmarine Barge No. 100
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. Nos. 90, 91PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
During the last four months of the year 1929 the libeled barges made several trips between New York and Waterford on the Hudson River in tow of tugs of the libelant, Cornell Steamboat Company. The towage was done at the request of Transmarine Corporation, which was operating the barges with the consent of their respective owners, and concededly it had not been paid for when the libels were filed on March 20, 1930. These facts would presumptively entitle the libelant to a maritime lien pursuant to section 30, subsections P and Q, of the Merchant Mat rine Act of 1920 (46…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The Murphy TugsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1886
- The AlligatorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- The American EagleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1929
- Dalzell Towing Co. v. J. W. Hennessy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Itel Containers International Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Itel Containers International Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Co. v. 5,775.674 Net Tons of CoalDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1983
- Itel Containers International Corporation v. Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992