Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. St. Martin
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 1, 2018No. CIVIL NO. JKB-16-0749PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames K. Bredar, Chief Judge
Gary Hobbs ("Plaintiff") brought an action against Sean St. Martin ("Defendant") for Money Had and Received (Count I) and Unjust Enrichment (Count II). (Am. Compl., ECF No. 29.) Now pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 48.) The Motion has been briefed (ECF Nos. 48-1, 51, and 55) and no hearing is required, see Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion will be DENIED.
I. Background
This case revolves around the conduct of an individual named Richard Hagen, a nonparty. Mr. Hagen operated a Ponzi scheme for years:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iko v. ShreveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Christina Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Al-Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Ambimjb, LLC v. Strategic Armory Corps, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Ambimjb, LLC v. Strategic Armory Corps, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Frosted Apple, LLC v. Coastal Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Lewis v. MeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.