Lewis v. Board of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The answer denies the allegation of the amended complaint to the effect that the moneys realized by the religious societies at the meetings referred to are utilized for the private and personal uses of the denominational groups. Rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice relieves defendant of the necessity of repeating or incorporating that denial in any defense. (See, also, Blackwell v. Columbia Trust Co., 199 App. Div. 759.) The first defense, wherein defendant alleges that the religious organizations are permitted to use public schools only for the conduct of ethical, educational and cultural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. Bd. of Education of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Rees v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rees v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Blackwell v. Columbia Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Rees v. Teachers' Retirement BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trietley v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Doremus v. Bd. of Education of HawthorneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Engel v. VitaleNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- 64th St. Residences, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LichtNew York Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.