Lambert v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
In Roman v. State, 1 the Alaska Supreme Court stated that, to be valid, parole and probation conditions 2 "must be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of the offender and the protection of the public and must not be unduly restrictive of liberty." 3
Joshua D. Lambert contends that the superior court erred in imposing three special conditions of probation that: (1) require he obtain a substance abuse evaluation; 4 (2) prohibit him from using or possessing alcohol or illegal controlled substances, and require that he submit to testing for those substances; 5 and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Allain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Marunich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Miyasato v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009