Legal Opinion

Lambert v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 21, 2007No. A-9665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

In Roman v. State, 1 the Alaska Supreme Court stated that, to be valid, parole and probation conditions 2 "must be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of the offender and the protection of the public and must not be unduly restrictive of liberty." 3

Joshua D. Lambert contends that the superior court erred in imposing three special conditions of probation that: (1) require he obtain a substance abuse evaluation; 4 (2) prohibit him from using or possessing alcohol or illegal controlled substances, and require that he submit to testing for those substances; 5 and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Allain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. Marunich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  5. Miyasato v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API