Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1988No. 87-231PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This was a declaratory judgment action in which each of the parties moved for summary judgment. The summary judgment motion of appellants, Amoco, Exxon and Chevron was denied, and the summary judgment motion of appellee, State of Wyoming was granted, the court declaring the severance tax upon non-hydrocarbon gases to be six percent of the value of the gross product extracted. This appeal is from the summary judgment in favor of appellee, State of Wyoming.

The single issue presented for our determination, as stated by appellants, is:

“Can the State, by interpretation, extend the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. State Board of Equalization v. Tenneco Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Joe Aulston and Lola Aulston v. United States of America, and Shell Western E & P, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Houghton v. FranscellWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Exxon Corporation v. Manuel Lujan, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, and the United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API