Legal Opinion

Lamoureux v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00665Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COLT RUSSELL LAMOUREUX, : Civil No. 1:20-CV-665 : Plaintiff : : v. : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) : ANDREW SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction The Supreme Court has underscored for us the limited scope of our review when considering Social Security appeals, noting that: The phrase “substantial evidence” is a “term of art” used throughout administrative law to describe how courts are to review agency factfinding. T-Mobile South, LLC v. Roswell, 574 U.S. ––––, ––––,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API