Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Boswell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBay, Judge

This was a suit on a negotiable promissory note executed by defendant and made payable to the order of plaintiff; judgment being rendered for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals to this court.

Upon the trial no instructions were asked or given, and no point is saved by the record except the overruling of the motion to suppress the depositions of Robert Hill and Collins D. White, taken on behalf of the plaintiff. The exceptions to the depositions were of a formal character, and had no reference to the competency or relevancy of the evidence. Among the rules of practice adopted by the court…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rigdon v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Taylor v. Heart of America Hospital Assn.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Johnson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Cator v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API