American Nat. Bank v. Bauman

Relator applied to the judge of tha district court of Caddo parish for a preliminary injunction enjoining the sale of relator’s property under executory process upon two grounds:

Eirst. That the note sued upon is prescribed upon its face, and, as there is no authentic evidence of the interruption of prescription, executory process improperly issued.

Second. That there is no proof whatever of the interruption of prescription.

The preliminary injunction was ’applied for under Act No. 29 of 1924, and, after hearing on the rule nisi, was refused by respondent judge.

Relator has invoked the…