Legal Opinion
In re the Dependency & Neglect of V. D. D.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1979No. 12139PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, Justice
(on reassignment).
This is an appeal from a decree of disposition terminating all of Appellant E.D.’s parental rights. We affirm.
E.D., a forty-eight year old full blooded Indian, is the mother of twelve children. Four of these children, V.D.D., H.P.D., L.J.D., L.G.D., are the subject of this appeal. The other eight children are not pertinent to this appeal. When this suit was initiated the four children were under the age of ten.
E.D.’s parental rights were terminated after the court found that her children were dependent and neglected within the meaning of SDCL 26-8-6. E.D. claims that this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re HanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- In re C.J.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- People in Interest of ARPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In re J.A.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.