Legal Opinion

Schang v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Nassau County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. *

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C. J.

At the Spring term, 1900, of the Circuit Court for Nassau county the plaintiff in error was indicted for rape of a child under ten years of age, was then tried and convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape, and from the sentence imposed sedes relief here by writ of error.

The record before us shows nothing more than the indictment and its proper presentation by the grand jury, the arraignment and plea of not guilty of the defendant, the empanelling and swearing of the jury, the verdict and sentence by the court.

The errors assigned are as follows: t. The court below erred in receiving…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Commonwealth v. RoosnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Lanier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API