Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. Schenck

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1930No. 671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

The defendant, Schenck, was driving an auto westward, towards Baton Rouge. Wayland Barley was driving plaintiff’s car in the same direction in the rear of defendant, at a distance of about fifty feet. It is not alleged by defendant that the plaintiff’s car was being driven at an excessive rate of speed at the time, or negligently. The fact is that it was not, as it appears that Barley was driving at about thirty-five miles an hour, and was making no effort to pass ahead of defendant’s car. It is shown that defendant abruptly and suddenly turned to his left to enter a small roadway in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. SingletaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Succession of BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vernon v. GillhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Pinchera v. Employers Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. White v. KennedyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Steadman v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API