Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Schwarzenbach-Huber Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of tlie Commissioner of Patents in a trademark interference. Tlie facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Van O its dee
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This is a trademark interference in which the contending parties are each claiming the prior right to tlie use of the word “Society” as a trademark for silk piece goods.
Appellant, Rice-Stix Dry Goods Company, a Missouri corporation, ivas granted registration of the mark in January, *2501915. Appellee, The Sehwarzenbach-IIuber Company, a New Jersey corporation, is seeking registration' of the mark, and, from the decision of the Commissioner granting its request, this appeal was taken.
Both the mark and the use are the same. The sole…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eiseman v. SchifferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- In Re Lyndale FarmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- La Fayette Brewery, Inc. v. Rock Island Brewing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937