Logan Et Ux. v. Illinois River Dev. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
(280 Pac. 123.)
COSIIOW, C. J.
Defendant has presented a petition for rehearing stressing two points. First, it takes issue with the former opinion in regard to attorneys’ fees. We think sufficient was said in the former opinion in that behalf: Advance Sheets, July 9, 1929, Vol. 8, No. 21 (279 Pac. 274). Unless some other error was found in the record defendant has no cause to complain of the action of the court below as to the amount allowed for attorneys’ fees in case redemption should be made: James v. Ward, 96 Or. 667 (190 Pac. 1105). Defendant could have saved the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Logan v. Illinois Rivers Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929