Legal Opinion

United States v. Worman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 28, 2010No. 19-2384PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

John Clark Worman challenges his conviction for mailing, possessing, and transporting a pipe bomb, citing certain inadmissible hearsay testimony and attacking the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The government cross-appeals, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by granting Worman’s motion for a downward variance. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, this court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands for resentencing.

I

On June 29, 2005, someone left a package in the lobby of a rural Iowa post office.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ira Green, Inc. v. Military Sales & Service Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. John Worman v. Frederick EntzelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. RubashkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Eric McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. April TillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API