People v. Peckham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
In a jury trial defendant was found guilty of violating section 220 of the Penal Code (assault with intent to commit rape). He appeals from the judgment. In a previous trial of the charge defendant was found guilty, and the judgment was reversed on the constitutional ground stated in People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361], (People v. Peckham, 232 Cal.App.2d 163 [42 Cal.Rptr. 673].)
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; that section 220 of the Penal Code is unconstitutionally vague; that the court erred in instructing the jury, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re HaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. PeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. AmadioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- State v. KidwellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Bryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Bryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987