Legal Opinion
People v. Carracedo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
During a pretrial suppression hearing, the trial court directed defendant not to communicate with his counsel about "the case” during an overnight recess that commenced in the middle of defendant’s testimony on cross-examination. Defendant was subsequently convicted of murder in the second degree. Relying on Geders v United States (425 US 80) and People v Enrique (165 AD2d 13, affd 80 NY2d 869), the Appellate Division ruled that the ban placed on defendant’s communication with his attorney violated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. HilliardNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. WardlawNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. LottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. RiddickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. WardlawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.